So the democrats
are doing this “The Life of Julia” campaign. It has issues. For those who don't
know, "The Life of Julia" depicts all the benefits Julia will get
from the government thanks to Obama. You can check it out at this link: “The Life of
Julia” It seems like it was planted by the opposition, it’s that bad.
For one thing, what
should you name a stock-figure woman, whose main relationship seems to be with
the Government? I'll give you a hint: not the same name as the the main female
protagonist of 1984. Fun fact: When you type in "the life of julia orwellian",
you get 4.3 million hits. Obviously, I'm not the only one who would find the
naming ironic.
Also, you
can’t just have a system of free riders. I’m as supportive of government
funded education and health care as the next person. Considering
my political leanings, perhaps more than the next person. But the
average citizen needs to contribute to society the same amount they take out.
In other words, the average citizen cannot be Julia. From age three to age 65,
all she does is take from the government. If they had just mentioned
Julia's tax rate, that she paid without complaining about how the government
never does anything for her, I'd be okay with this campaign. It's hard to
argue with the Ledbetter Equal Pay Act, after all : ) But the relationship
depicted is very one-sided.
It’s pretty obvious
this campaign is trying to capitalizing on its gender gap. That's fine, I just
wish they'd leave 1984 allusions out of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment